Locus Robotics vs AutoStore

September 27, 2024
by Anthony Robinson

Warehouse automation has been a game-changer for modern businesses in recent years. Two of the most popular solutions currently in the market are Locus Robotics and AutoStore. Both of these technologies are designed to automate warehouse operations, improve efficiency, and reduce labor costs. In this article, we will compare Locus Robotics and AutoStore, delve into their workings, and discuss which solution is better suited for your business.

Introduction: Understanding the basics of Locus Robotics and AutoStore

Locus Robotics is a mobile robot solution that provides autonomous logistics services for warehouses. LocusBots are designed to work alongside warehouse associates, reducing the time spent on manual tasks. The robots can be easily integrated into the warehouse management system, tracking inventory, and optimizing workflow. On the other hand, AutoStore is an automated storage and retrieval system. It uses a cube storage design and a grid of bins containing products. The bins are stacked and arranged on top of each other, with robots moving on top of them to retrieve and store products.

One of the key benefits of Locus Robotics is its ability to adapt to changing warehouse needs. The robots can be easily reconfigured to handle different types of products and tasks, making them a flexible solution for warehouses with varying needs. Additionally, LocusBots are equipped with advanced sensors and safety features, ensuring a safe working environment for both the robots and warehouse associates.

AutoStore, on the other hand, is known for its high-density storage capabilities. The cube storage design allows for more products to be stored in a smaller space, maximizing warehouse efficiency. The system also uses a goods-to-person model, where the robots bring the products to the warehouse associates, reducing the need for associates to move around the warehouse. This not only saves time but also reduces the risk of injury from heavy lifting and repetitive motions.

The evolution of warehouse automation: A brief history

Warehouse automation has come a long way in the past decade. Only a few years ago, warehouses relied on manual operations, with employees moving products around manually using forklifts or other machines. However, with the rise of e-commerce and the increasing demand for fast and efficient delivery, warehouses have had to evolve and adopt automation solutions. Locus Robotics and AutoStore are examples of the resulting technological advances.

One of the most significant benefits of warehouse automation is the reduction in errors and increased accuracy. Automated systems can scan and track inventory in real-time, reducing the risk of misplaced or lost items. Additionally, automation can help optimize warehouse space, allowing for more efficient use of storage and reducing the need for excess inventory. As technology continues to advance, we can expect to see even more innovative solutions in the world of warehouse automation.

How does Locus Robotics work?

Locus Robotics utilizes a fleet of autonomous robots to pick and transport orders. The robots are equipped with various sensors, making them able to move around the warehouse and avoid obstacles. When an order comes in, the system calculates the best route for the LocusBots to take while considering factors such as distance, availability, and the product's weight and size. The robots then pick and transport the items to a designated location, which is signified by the system.

One of the key benefits of Locus Robotics is its ability to adapt to changing warehouse layouts and inventory. The robots can easily navigate around new obstacles or changes in the warehouse environment, without the need for reprogramming or manual intervention. This flexibility allows for increased efficiency and productivity, as the system can quickly adjust to meet the demands of the warehouse and its customers.

How does AutoStore work?

AutoStore uses a cube storage system with bins that can be stacked and arranged on top of each other. A fleet of robots moves over the top of these bins, picking up and transporting products as required. The robots use a combination of sensors and cameras to navigate the system and retrieve the products based on the pick order. AutoStore is optimized to increase density, and by using the cube design, warehouse operators can store more products in a smaller area.

One of the key advantages of AutoStore is its flexibility. The system can be easily adapted to fit the specific needs of a warehouse, with the number of bins and robots able to be scaled up or down as required. This means that AutoStore can be used in a wide range of industries, from e-commerce to healthcare, and can be customized to suit the unique requirements of each business.

Another benefit of AutoStore is its efficiency. The robots are able to work around the clock, without the need for breaks or rest periods, and can quickly retrieve products from the storage bins. This means that businesses using AutoStore can process orders faster and more accurately, leading to increased customer satisfaction and improved profitability.

Comparing the technology behind Locus Robotics and AutoStore

Both systems use superior technology that is designed to automate warehouse operations, save time and reduce labor costs. Locus Robotics uses autonomous mobile robots with sensors to move around the warehouse, while AutoStore uses a cube storage system with a grid of bins and robots to move on top of these bins and pick up products. Locus Robotics is optimized for speed, while AutoStore is optimized for density.

One advantage of Locus Robotics is its ability to adapt to changing warehouse layouts. The robots can easily navigate around obstacles and adjust their routes to accommodate new inventory or changes in the warehouse floor plan. On the other hand, AutoStore's cube storage system allows for more efficient use of vertical space, making it a great option for warehouses with limited floor space.

Another key difference between the two systems is their maintenance requirements. Locus Robotics' robots are designed to be easily serviced and repaired, with minimal downtime. AutoStore's cube storage system, however, requires more maintenance due to the complexity of the system and the need to keep the bins and robots in good working order.

Key differences between Locus Robotics and AutoStore

The main difference between the Locus Robotics and AutoStore systems is their design and workflow. Locus Robotics uses a mobile robot solution while AutoStore uses a cube storage system. Locus Robotics is optimized for order fulfillment, while AutoStore is optimized for storage and density.

Another key difference between Locus Robotics and AutoStore is their scalability. Locus Robotics can easily scale up or down based on the needs of the warehouse, while AutoStore requires a complete redesign and installation of a new system to accommodate changes in demand. Additionally, Locus Robotics offers real-time data and analytics to help optimize warehouse operations, while AutoStore has limited reporting capabilities.

Which solution is more efficient in terms of speed?

Locus Robotics is highly efficient in terms of speed since it is designed for order fulfillment. The LocusBots are agile and can quickly navigate the warehouse to pick and deliver products. AutoStore is also fast but not as quick in moving around the warehouse compared to Locus Robotics.

However, when it comes to handling larger and heavier items, AutoStore has an advantage over Locus Robotics. The robots used in AutoStore have a higher weight capacity and can handle items up to 77 pounds, while LocusBots can only handle items up to 50 pounds.

Another factor to consider is the layout of the warehouse. Locus Robotics is better suited for warehouses with a more open layout, while AutoStore can work well in warehouses with a more compact layout. This is because AutoStore uses a grid system to store items, which allows for more efficient use of space.

Which solution is more cost-effective?

Cost-effectiveness varies depending on warehouse size and workflow. Generally, Locus Robotics is more cost-effective for warehouses with high order volume, while AutoStore is more cost-effective for larger warehouses that require high-density storage solutions. A cost analysis should be performed to determine which solution is more suitable for your business, based on factors such as the number of employees, space limitations, and workflow.

It is important to note that while cost is a significant factor in choosing a warehouse automation solution, it should not be the only consideration. Other factors such as ease of implementation, maintenance requirements, and scalability should also be taken into account. Additionally, it is important to consider the long-term benefits and ROI of each solution, rather than just the upfront cost.

Which solution is better suited for small warehouses?

Locus Robotics is better suited for small warehouses where space is limited due to the flexibility of its mobile robots. The robots can maneuver around tight spaces, making it easier to maximize every inch of space available.

Which solution is better suited for large warehouses?

AutoStore is better suited for larger warehouses due to its cube design, which optimizes the space used. The system can store and retrieve a large volume of products in a compact area, making it easier to manage inventory and pick orders at scale.

User experience: Comparing Locus Robotics and AutoStore from an operator perspective

From an operator perspective, both Locus Robotics and AutoStore provide significant benefits. Locus Robotics improves the overall experience by reducing the amount of residual movement and strain on employees associated with traditional manual pick and pack tasks. AutoStore streamlines pick and pack operations, enabling operators to focus on more important responsibilities, thereby reducing the time required for order fulfillment and inventory management.

Maintenance and support: A comparison between Locus Robotics and AutoStore

Both solutions are designed with durability in mind, but maintenance and support requirements vary. Locus Robotics has fewer components, which means fewer opportunities for malfunctions, making it easier to maintain. AutoStore requires more routine maintenance to ensure smooth operation and to prevent issues caused by wear and tear.

Real-world examples of companies using Locus Robotics vs AutoStore

A few examples of companies using Locus Robotics include American Eagle Outfitters, Boots, and Quiet Logistics. AutoStore clients include Puma, Uniqlo, and Electrical Discount. Both solutions are utilized by businesses that have similar workflow and product characteristics.

Future prospects: What lies ahead for warehouse automation with Locus Robotics and AutoStore?

The warehouse automation market is expected to keep on growing in the coming years, and both Locus Robotics and AutoStore will continue to evolve with the market. Locus Robotics aims to improve its capabilities to handle more complex products and further enhance its technology using machine learning. AutoStore aims to expand its product portfolio beyond storage and retrieval, adding additional capabilities such as sorting and packing.

Conclusion: Which solution is right for your business?

Both Locus Robotics and AutoStore provide significant benefits in warehouse automation. The solution you choose depends on the size of your warehouse, the volume of your orders, and the nature of the products you're selling. It's important to identify your unique needs, analyze your workflow and budget, and review how each solution can help optimize your warehouse operations.

About the Author

Anthony Robinson is the CEO of ShipScience, a pioneering company dedicated to helping e-commerce leaders optimize their shipping decisions, reduce costs, and automate tedious processes. With a Bachelor of Science in Economics from Stanford University, Anthony brings over a decade of expertise in logistics, business development, and operational efficiency to the table.

Since founding ShipScience in 2018, Anthony has empowered numerous e-commerce businesses to navigate the complexities of parcel shipping through data-driven insights and innovative solutions. His leadership extends beyond ShipScience, having established Refund Geeks and served on advisory boards at Ciye and RESA Power, showcasing his commitment to driving corporate growth and enhancing operational strategies.

Anthony is passionate about leveraging technology to streamline supply chains and improve customer experiences in the last mile. When he’s not strategizing shipping solutions, he enjoys connecting with industry leaders and staying ahead of the latest trends in e-commerce and logistics.

Connect with Anthony on LinkedIn to learn more about his work and insights on optimizing shipping for e-commerce businesses.

Revolutionize your parcel shipping strategy.

Get a free analysis
© Copyright 2024 ShipScience.com. All Rights Reserved.  Terms of Use  |  Privacy